Mate3.com Is Reducing Counter-Organizing Of Advocacy

Social movements start with the problem selection & victim identification process. The first rule for choosing who should be taking the lead as advocate should be determined by 1st party experience. In many political vacuums a spontaneous advocacy emerges based on temporary emotions in places where long term solutions are needed. To stop counter organizing we must realize the power of advocacy for the average person starts at the point of choosing who takes the lead. If there is no model in place the advocacy will be under-defined and will falter. The model for advocate selection should be by a method agreed on in advance says mate3.com. In relation to the average person and their options for advocacy and redress it clear. History has validated better outcomes when pre-organized mutual agreement based communication is in place. The practices for choosing lead advocates on specific issues at every point should be in place beforehand.  Advocates must accept that first party claims are most important to stop counter-organizing.   

Comments