Summaries Of Networking 1-13

"The Blueprint To Lift Every Voice"

Chapter 1
Step-1 We collect the 1st party claims to the mate3 questions.        
(1) What happened to you?                                                                                                      
(2) What would you like to see happen?
(3) And how do you think others can help? represents a more effective advocacy model for handling the suggestions and claims made by individuals. Our networking starts from the point you make a 1st party claim or share an experience for pointing out a problem or potential problem. The method opens full inclusiveness for defining problems and selecting solutions. This method adds a transparent continuum to what is claimed, collected and acknowledged. 

Step-2 Organize and aggregate the collected 1st party claims for connecting with first step organizers, advocates, databases and others that have similar experiences and claims.
 click here to read our updated policies for handling individual input.

Step-3 Have the 1st party claims of experience collected ready to present as needed to define problems and validate solutions.

Step-4 Invite others to contribute their 1st party claims to the network collection in an ongoing collection effort.

By raising the value of the 1st party claims we create a margin of empowerment for the average person. 

Step-5 simultaneously recruit individuals to initiate 1st party experience based advocacy, activism and volunteerism.

We collect more claims,
from more individuals
in more places,
on more subjects &
 at more times, than anyone! 

We distribute the claims we receive for the empowerment of the individual. 
Tell us the type of claims you're interested in by emailing to: 

Direct Benefits Of Networking  
(1) Gives you a pre-plan for getting advocacy assistance faster. (2) Gives you improved distribution of your 1st party experiences and claims to responsible and interested persons. (3) Gives you the leverage of mutually agreeing members to account for your submitted experiences, claims and suggestions. (4) Gives you systematic one-point access to others to help find solutions. (5) Gives you easier and faster start-up time for early intervention.(6) Gives you the position to become aware of the 1st party claims from others on the same issue as yours. (7) Gives you connectivity to engage in defining problems, building advocacy and validating solutions. (9) Gives faster sharing with others who are related to the issue by previous experience, position or interest. 

Chapter 2
The political, the self-righteous, and the lobbyist all hate networking subliminally or directly. Mate3 networking is dependent on the 1st party experience and their claim. This kind of networking illuminates bad actors, bad policies and bad positions for knowing the truth. The claim of acting on behalf of people you don’t have a verbal or written agreement with undermines truth in advocacy for the average person. We've learned that by raising the value and importance of the 1st party claim we have been setting future standards. We learned how to set policy that makes the continuum factor of 1st party claim collecting and sharing a part of solution validation. We’ve learned to use the internet to present and connect collected claims in ways to generate benefits for the average person. We’ve learned and practiced how to rapidly handle large amounts of individual input.  

Chapter 3

I first took the lead on promoting the importance of better collecting and handling of the individual narrative in the late 70’s. Now that technology is catching up with my thinking the best of my expertise is yet to come.
At we continue to find that too many 1st party narratives from the impacted people are missing. Those missing narratives hurt our understanding and education on the various matters. That hurt understanding causes hindrances to our ability to organize and advocate. As in science we know to measure something requires that a value is given to what we are measuring. In networking we place a top-shelf value on the 1st party claimed experience from the ones having them. We’ve also learned that managing the claims of those with the firsthand experience is mandatory to remapping advocacy for the average person. Developing policies for handling the claimed experiences and suggestions that come from average people is at the center of the frontline. These emerging policies demand a continuum of follow up claim collection for validation. They also require the best practice of mutually agreed based communication on the front-end. We suggest and promote a highly transparent multi-step collecting and handling process with methods that foster confidence and a sense of fairness. We call our suggestion the mutual agreement to exchange 3.  

Chapter 4

This is what we have learned from promoting the 50/50 benchmark. Once the 1st parties impacted designate a collector of their claims. The next step is using the Public Claims Posting Administrator method. This means that when the individual claims and suggestions come in, it’s the function of the P.C.P.A. to post and maintain those first party claims so all interested can have access. This method increases transparency and engagement simultaneously. Each individual has the right to share their claims and experiences with whom they chose.  Listen! networkers and I have a history of promoting the value in registering and issuing authorized citizen claim handling permits. 

Chapter 5

The first 50/50 rule was raised by mate3 networkers and myself as a benchmark. A benchmark standard for inclusion of 1st party claimants. With this rule the ones with the problem and those that could be impacted by the problem are included significantly. The rule implies that when you work or advocate to solve a problem for someone else you should have a mutual agreement with those 1st parties. The rule emerged from seeing too many advocates organize around people’s problems without organizing around the 1st party claims. We observed that those citizen claims became handled in a way that has resulted in temporary emotions and short-term solutions. This problem of under-organizing occurs when we don’t predicate solutions on the claims of the 1st party.  Those who have the problem will work harder and longer for a solution if committed on the frontend. So we’ve learned that when organizers coopt the 1st party claims they make us all more likely to be victims of weak advocacy.  

 Chapter 6
1st party claim collecting for networking is growing.. The traditional community organizers are being joined by 1st party claim collectors. When the two work together the result is more empowerment for you and me. What Corporations have done for themselves pushes the average person to an easy conclusion in regards to their advocacy? That conclusion is that we need a Corporation to assure that individual input has a valued role. Big data and data scientist are becoming the prophets for the secular decision making. So having a tool for navigating our redress under the best government that money can buy is necessary. No doubt the profitable corporations know the way to get cooperation with their narratives. Those corporations have proven that they can get that needed cooperation at an affordable price. Citizen cooperation is an essential ingredient needed to make power work and profit making easier. The value of the corporate product is always dependent on the perception held by the user. The more accurately you can define how a held perception emerged for the user, the better able you are to solve problems with the perception.
Years ago I brought together our first task force to examine individual experience ID theft prevention strategies. Since our initial examination we developed several policy outlines to better validate our 1st party claims. If you are following us on this journey from the beginning, as we pledged earlier, you are on the frontline of the fight for your 1st party input rights.

Chapter 7
Today let’s talk about the Individual Experience ID Theft Prevention Policies that are emerging and how they can and cannot add value to personal data for you and I. Corporations are being designed to capture the value of 1st party experiences, and that value capture creates an opportunity for you and I to be a stakeholder. The emerging policy sets to which I’m referring will authorize and position 1st party claims and suggestions.  Secondly these policies will set validation check-points for auditing the 1st party claim handling. If you can follow us into this brave new territory you are certain to benefit. Social movements start with an identified problem and target to put pressure on. The first rule for the one with the problem is choosing who will take their claim and be part of the advocacy. In many political vacuums a spontaneous advocacy emerges based on temporary emotions in places where long term solutions are needed. To stop counter organizing of 1st party claims we must use the power of connected advocacy for the average person. Our best advocacy starts at the point of choosing who takes the claim. If there is no model in place for who collects the 1st party claim, the problem and needed advocacy becomes under-defined. The model for advocacy and claim handling should be by a policy agreed on in advance.

Chapter 8
Our best advocacy assistance starts at the point of choosing who collects our 1st party claims. If there is no 1st party claim handling policy in place the problem will be under-defined and have flaws. Policies and options for the average person to have redress and get advocacy should be clear. We know that better outcomes can be achieved when we pre-organize mutual agreement based communication to define and solve problems. The practices for choosing claim collectors and advocates on specific issues at every point should be in place beforehand.  Advocates must accept that first party claims are critical to stopping counter-organizing and individual experience ID theft.   

Chapter 9
The Citizen Advocacy Reform Movement has been effective by way of our networking 1st party claims using Citizen input handling has been the focus of our networking and that has led to numerous new standards. We have advanced the start-up options for individuals to get advocacy assistance. We have standardized a problem defining and solution validation process using 1st party input. We have established a format for organizations of individuals to exchange and cross-compare 1st party input. The system is designed with leanness and agility for early intervention to collect 1st party claims. The goal is to get more traditional public service agencies, organizations and groups to evolve in to being more efficient and accountable. Moving the organizing focus from general issue based organizing to the 1st party claim based model has been a game changer. We have brought advocacy assistance for the average person to a 24/7 ready to use status. We’ve added speed to the start-up and innovated on the handling of 1st party claims. By normalizing newer policies for individual input handling we’ve created capacity to scale up to maximum impact. Today we are establishing the value, rules and requirement of our 1st party claims and suggestions, and this is the first level of our empowerment.

Chapter 10
All are enriched when there is the co-generation of energy directed into problem defining and validating of solutions. In the past our input, claims and suggestions were filtered by a 3rd or 4th party. Today we have the option of self-connecting our 1st party claims and input. A benefit of today’s internet and information management to the public is affordability. So we can afford to have the actual 1st party witness and input engaged in solving problems. Because of connectable formatting the amount and speed we can share gathered input has skyrocketed. In the case of networking the value is to us impacts problem defining, solution validation and member advocacy. Where your 1st party input is required, is where you have value for input. How can that value be transacted? And what is making the value? The value is in getting a direct feed of verified 1st party claims, suggestions and findings for research, speculation etc... Intellectual property (IP) is a legal term that refers to creations of the mind. Examples of intellectual property include words, phrases, symbols, designs etc...   The thinking is that creators will not have sufficient incentive to invent unless they are legally entitled to capture the full social value of their inventions". The intellectual property found in words is desirable because it encourages thought analysis which inspires innovation to perspective. acknowledges the one giving the input and organizes it in a way to keep the one providing the input engaged in defining their problem and selecting a solution. It’s true that a Copyright does not cover ideas and information themselves; but it does cover the form or manner in which they are expressed.

Chapter 11
On Increasing Capacity to Include Citizen Claims we have lowered the cost to add 1st party claims. That cost decrease improves advocacy options for average people.The capacity to integrate the claims and inputs from individuals into first step organizing initiatives is game changing. Early acknowledgement of the citizen demand for this kind of input integration has been critical to the implementation success. In this era of big data collecting we have been positioned to raise the advocacy and need for collecting individual claims to compare with big data based recommendations. networking is charting policy direction for best practices for handling our individual input. To incentivize participation we invested in advance organizing to build mutually agreed communication exchange groups. Now individuals are signing up in advance to give their 1st party claims. The claims will be used for defining problems, directing advocacy and validating solutions. The program serves former prisoners, job applicants, defendants, plaintiffs, landlords, tenants and others will be giving feedback. Their feedback will be used to inform public awareness on a variety of issues. The participants are agreeing to share their 1st party experience on what happens to them. They will share their experience interacting with government agencies, courts, institutions, private enterprises etc.… Those answers will be shared for public awareness, problem defining, advocacy and solution validation.

Chapter 12
In the past 1st party claims got coopted by media employees, public administrators, church leaders, politicians and other pop-up advocates. If was a time when 1st party claim snatchers took the led as the authorized advocates. The voice of the people went from being ignored to being misdirected. Later we got the validation of a misdirected solution which was an inside job without the 1st party claimants. The practice of 1st party claim snatching grew and got more undermining through outside selection of who collected specific claims. Soon advocates were letting their agenda become determined by the media reports and their upward mobility. The value of 1st party claims continued declining in importance to organizers and became replaced with mobilizing for the media commercials. At the same time corporate media was interpreting freedom of speech as their right to define the problems and validate solutions for others. Media narratives began to hunt and suppress information based on their corporate desires.  The corporate rights bestowed on their journalist then became corporate media’s personal tune maker. Their job has been promoting narratives and nudging citizens for their corporate interest. As a result we have a mostly competitive relationship between the public interest, corporate interest and the 1st party claims. Organizing around issues and not organizing around the 1st party claims is occurring at enormous cost to society. Now that the value of having timely 1st party claims is rising so should benefits. members are determined to have our claims valued, respected and protected.  Feature of a Smart Organizing Movement is that it has a pre-organized mutual agreement to have communication exchange with each member or follower. “This is smart because communication is intended for defining the shared narrative. The Fair and equal sharing and receiving of 1st party claims is quality communication, if mutually agreed.

Chapter 13
Establishing the mutual agreement with another person or group requires perceiving the value being actualized. The points in our lives where we can use public awareness or advocacy assistance should be commonly discussed. Yet most of us do not think about our advocacy as an average person. Many of us envision having influence on society or the system that we don’t actually have. Unfortunately we tend to only learn of this disconnect when we have a cause requiring others to have a better understanding. networking is a language for (1) Making the value of the mutual agreement known to others. (2) Measuring the benefits to having a mutual agreement with others. (3) Bringing 1st party claims to be co-worker in problem defining. (4) Presenting nuances that impact the individual experience. (5) Presenting 1st party claims as evidence to validate solutions. The language opens access to a continuum of exchange. At the same time it’s the handling policies for the collected input that raises its value to the market. Data-collected within a mutually agreed space adds value to the 1st parties. An early identified effect of using the mate3 language is that it facilitates trust. And greatly increases cross-cause understanding and advocacy support. The 2nd Level Of Your Input Empowerment is the ability to set the policies that help you track, audit and identify when your input is being misdirected, manipulated, misaligned or stolen.