What happened? I was led to believe that a group I joined had more pledged members than they had. Key Insight: Misrepresentation of support undermines strategic decision-making and community trust.
What would you like to see happen? I’d like to see metrics for what successful leadership is in terms of steps to growth and scalability. Opportunities: Co-create transparent leadership, vetting metrics — things like: (1) Onboarding conversion and sustainment rates. (2) Member retention stats. (3) Trust indicators (e.g. response times and acceptance of options with growth velocity benchmarks. (4) Engagement retention services.
How do you think others can help? I think others can help by joining and improving the options for working together within mutually agreed communication exchange policies. Suggested Strategies: (1) Develop group communication charters: Who shares what, when, and how? (2) Create opt-in transparency dashboards (member pledges, engagement levels, etc.) (3) Form a rotating peer accountability circle to check shared goals and commitments.
Comments
Post a Comment