What happened? I began experiencing allergic reactions and discovered mold in my apartment at River Place in Detroit, MI. Despite reporting the issue, the mold returned, and I was pregnant at the time. We went to court to resolve my lease obligation and rent payments after the second mold incident. The judge ruled that I could exit the lease and was not responsible for rent after my second complaint. However, Princeton Management’s attorneys misinterpreted the ruling, creating grounds for retaliatory charges. I vacated the apartment within 28 days—two days ahead of the court’s 30-day allowance—and left the unit in compliant condition. Instead of receiving my security deposit, I was denied it and billed for rent during a time when I was exposed to toxic mold.
What would you like to see happen? Judges handling tenant health and safety cases must issue clearer, more comprehensive rulings. Ambiguity enables property managers to exploit legal gray areas and retaliate against tenants who assert their rights. We need rulings that protect renters from being penalized for defending their health and dignity.
How do you think others can help? Organize. Speak out. Be vigilant. Property owners and managers who weaponize legal ambiguity are a public threat to renters. Communities must build awareness, share resources, and support each other in holding these entities accountable.
Comments
Post a Comment