Reducing the spontaneous mobilizing that was being built without communication agreements and that was weak in scalability, was the first task. Before mate3 networking spontaneous mobilizers had taken on the characteristic of openly chasing media attention by hook or crook. The once prominent tactic of getting public attention and organizing around general "causes" had created a stage for wishes, opinions, theories and multiple proposals for unvetted financial assistance. Once the stage had been set, institutions and corporations wasted no time or effort to control and limit the available options presented to the affected 1st parties. Then suddenly groups and individuals spontaneously began claiming to represent people that were not any part of their movements. Next the corporate media compounded and fed into the narrative that they covered the authentic voices for the people. At the same time the media conglomerates themselves were demanding first amendment rights and options for their companies. Those media companies were simultaneously denying the voices of those with firsthand lived experiences for their own support. Later when defining the methodology for mate3 networking and before its introduction I had specific considerations. The first consideration was protecting the advocacy assistance from malicious counterinsurgents. My first move was separating the subscription component, the sacrificial service component, the onboarding component and the open integrating of productive options component. My personal interest and knowledge of systems, computing and machine learning started twenty-two years before the introduction of mate3 networking in 2014.
Comments
Post a Comment